About this part of the site

Hello, this is not the main owner of the site speaking, rather this is a person who has paid him to host content of their investigation into a cult which is reffered to as "The Nexus". I say "reffered to" simply because they don't seem to all agree on a central name, despite having hosted formal meetings with all of the collectives associated with their cult. I believe they avoid using formal names in order to be harder to pin down whenever they release "public" manuscripts/booklets. I have seen absolutely no coverage of this group on the internet, and I believe that is due to their policy of anonymity. As per the site owner's wishes, I will rarely post original scanned manuscripts on this site, as he sees it as a potential legal risk. He also requires the disclaimer you saw on your way to this page, however it is not truthful, none of this is fiction. The site owner warns against practicing and consuming too much of this content at a time, as he believes he would have personal consequences if viewers were to take any of this content as real. That doesn't mean anyone should attempt the rituals presented here, and key details to the rituals will be omitted intially as per the site owner's wishes. The owner of the site has creative control regarding the HTML editing of this part of the site, and in having said right has final editing rights as well. This simply means that the contents of this area have been requested to match the style of the rest of this site, which I have agreed to because I do not know and frankly don't care to know how to write and format HTML.

The rough beginning of "The Nexus"

I figure I should give you some context as to the beginning of this group. The information I have points to them starting in the 1950's, however members and core texts claim that it has existed for hundreds, sometimes claiming thousands, of years ago. The information I have clearly shows their outward recruiting activity to originate through mailed recruitment pamphlets in the late 1950's, it is suspected through members journals that they selected people locally based off of mental qualities they observed from stalking "outcasts" in their area. It is currently unknown exactly where it started, but the language used in these pamphlets point to them starting in the east coast of America, some sources pointing to New York and others pointing to Arlington in VA. It is unknown the exact membership at the time, but the pseudonym of the founder, as no legal name has been discovered, is known. He goes by the name "Mors Intra", which roughly translates to "Death Within" in latin. This name is attributed to the founder, but whether or not the founder is the only one who uses this pen name is unknown, as many texts have been signed by this name even after the alleged death of the original founder.

Why care about this cult?

My main reason for investigating this cult is that I believe they are not only dangerous, but have a large following (estimates in the thousands globally). The core of their danger is in their violent beliefs and practice of indoctrinating people through a series of psychedelic drugging and forcing them to look at their crafted imagery. This practice tends to weed out the mentally unstable from their initiates, which they then use said mentally unstable people to enact violence on a large scale. The rest of my reasoning can be deduced from reading manuscripts and interviews provided here.

What's the deal with the transcripts?

The sources I have are mainly, as far as I can tell, older members of the group which have seemingly become disilusioned with how the group has been operating in the modern day. I don't see their resentment for the modern group as an admission of guilt, but rather a longing for the old ways the group had operated. Knowing this, it seems obvious to me that the information they give me is going to be somewhat unreliable, especially since they are unwilling, for the most part, to give me any original copies of their material. They claim this is for anonymities sake, but I really don't buy that excuse. However, the information they have given me has mostly lined up with my expectations of the group, which is why I choose to share it here anyway. I will eventually give a digested/analyzed summary of what has been given to me to try and give a clearer non-deceptive view of the material presented. Until I have the time to really do so and the bulk of the work has been submitted here, the trancsripts will have to suffice.

Who Are You?

While I don't personally think it is important to the investigation at hand, I can see why people would be curious. To start, I am not and have never been a member of the group. The site's owner has thrown this accusation at me, and it seems the only way to calm his nerves regarding this is to allow him to have full control over the HTMl editing of this part of the site, which I obliged to as I do not know how to write HTML. I am merely an individual who had seen a few pamphlets distributed by this group in the 90s, which peaked my interest and once the internet had morphed into what it is today, I finally began looking into this group. I am unwilling to give anymore information for my own sake, as I too care about anonymity.